From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31373 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 00:04:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 31363 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2008 00:04:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:04:20 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6912E98151; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:04:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9CF9811F; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:04:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JK0R5-0006f5-QT; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:04:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Andreas Schwab , Marc Khouzam , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -var-update using formatted value Message-ID: <20080130000415.GA25352@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Andreas Schwab , Marc Khouzam , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04290E1B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <18311.60638.724524.220449@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080111225928.GA26360@caradoc.them.org> <18311.65093.38930.103045@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080111235219.GA29698@caradoc.them.org> <18315.589.840507.551878@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080129212632.GB17544@caradoc.them.org> <18335.47960.519547.477953@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18335.47960.519547.477953@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:48:40PM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > Both changes, i.e., printcmd.c and c-exp.y? Right. > Presumably if the change to c-exp.y is committed, there should be similar > changes to ada-exp.y, f-exp.y etc. Does it not matter that this prefix > is not part of the underlying language? Right. As long as it doesn't conflict with the underlying language, no, it doesn't matter - GDB tries to accept the whole source language, but also accepts other things. > Also, I think only the change to printcmd.c is necessary to solve Marcs bug > report about -var-update. I think that report is covered by two of the other patches I reviewed today. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery