From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18078 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2008 20:11:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 18066 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2008 20:11:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:11:01 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E5C98375; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:10:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA9898022; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:10:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JH2yw-0000Rr-Cq; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:10:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Igor Korot Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Is it supported in new version? Message-ID: <20080121201058.GA1702@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Igor Korot , gdb@sourceware.org References: <17488423.1200945193993.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17488423.1200945193993.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:53:13PM -0500, Igor Korot wrote: > Now my question is: Is new version of gdb works the same or is it works > like previous version of gdb? Please make a simple, self-contained test case. Something that we can compile and debug ourselves to see exactly what you mean. GDB does not currently support inlined functions, so it's probably not behaving like you'd expect - it thinks the body of the inlined function is part of that function's caller. But I hope that will change this year. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery