From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16845 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2008 17:53:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 16836 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2008 17:53:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:53:15 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE4898009; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:53:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9540598005; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:53:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JFvOy-0007kv-Kc; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:53:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Marc Khouzam Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: -var-update using formatted value Message-ID: <20080118175312.GA29504@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Marc Khouzam , gdb@sourceware.org References: <18320.559.863596.871051@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA2DE096@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <20080118154059.GA22643@caradoc.them.org> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA2DE097@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA2DE097@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:17:19PM -0500, Marc Khouzam wrote: > In my case, since I display all formats (sometimes), I need to do > var-evaluate-expression on every displayed variable, since var-update won't > properly tell me which variable really changed (in the case of float and strings). We should fix that. Is checking in natural format the answer? Do we really need to check all supported formats - that could get out of hand if we support custom formatting someday. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery