From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22582 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2008 17:26:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22574 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2008 17:26:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:26:24 +0000 Received: from zps76.corp.google.com (zps76.corp.google.com [172.25.146.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m0FHQGfA014712 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:26:16 GMT Received: from localhost (ruffy.corp.google.com [172.18.118.116]) by zps76.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m0FHQFiA022615 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:26:15 -0800 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 67641) id 232D61C7245; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:26:15 -0800 (PST) To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: gdbserver + libiberty? Message-Id: <20080115172615.232D61C7245@localhost> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:26:00 -0000 From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 Hi. Is there any reason to not link gdbserver with libiberty? I'm working on a patch where that would be useful.