From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1884 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2007 02:27:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 1875 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2007 02:27:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:27:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E87D98129 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:27:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B0C98100 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:27:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J4SAn-0000nv-CC for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:27:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: rwatchpoint configuration Message-ID: <20071218022709.GA2954@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20071218004823.GA30270@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:59:39PM -0800, Siva Velusamy wrote: > In this thread: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2005-11/msg00251.html > > Eli mentions that "If someone finds a way to announce a read > watchpoint when the value changed on a target that supports that, > without losing support for read watchpoints on x86 (which is by far > the most popular platform these days), I'll gladly agree to such a > change" That sounds like what I was thinking of. > So I guess the question really is if there has been an update to this. Not that I know of. We'd need some sort of way to say "read watchpoints are not supported, emulate it with an access watchpoint instead". -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery