From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9649 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2007 04:45:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 9590 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2007 04:45:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:45:31 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7526998054; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5830098022; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J3Ou0-0007uS-3U; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:45:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers Message-ID: <20071215044528.GA30384@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <498552560712141430q75098aaembcda8db5c6edd8fb@mail.gmail.com> <20071214223532.GA11966@caradoc.them.org> <498552560712141447q41c168b7k17c9bde81319feb7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <498552560712141447q41c168b7k17c9bde81319feb7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:47:02PM -0800, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote: > The new encoding format I am proposing fall between DW_ATE_lo_user and > DW_ATE_hi_user. So they are vendor extensions. Currently gcc uses > DW_ATE_lo_user, which collides with an HP vendor extension. If we already have one vendor extension, why switch? The vendor extensions conflict with other vendors... that's by definition. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery