Re: gdbserver and "terminated with signal SIGTRAP"

Atsushi Nemoto
2007-11-30T15:36:08Z

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:13:53 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-10/msg00547.html ("[commit]
> > gdbserver support for debugging without libthread_db") is the commit?
>
> Yes. We now attach to new threads based on kernel events, and we no
> longer track things based on the pthread_t ID. Those two together
> eliminate this race.

Thank you. I'll look at the patch deeper. Do you think it can be
backported to gdb 6.6? Could you give me any suggestions?