From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27757 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2007 19:22:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 27748 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2007 19:22:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:22:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618D198349; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:22:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04014980A7; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:22:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IwjXV-00047s-4Z; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:22:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Guillaume MENANT , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB commands Message-ID: <20071126192241.GA15559@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Guillaume MENANT , gdb@sourceware.org References: <4742E4CF.2080408@geensys.com> <13909280.post@talk.nabble.com> <1196103707.2501.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1196103707.2501.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:01:47AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > 1) You need a way to read and write memory. There are > several candidates, one being the original 'm' and 'M', > another being the newer 'x' and 'X' (binary encoded). Just 'X', no 'x'; 'x' would be a logical addition but no one's been round to it. All the rest of what Michael's written looks correct to me. You can get by with very few packets... but if you want a useful debugging stub, you may need more. I suspect '?' is mandatory. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery