From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5759 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2007 21:04:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5750 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2007 21:04:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:04:17 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A96098340; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:04:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5456F9833F; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:04:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IlWLm-00015z-4P; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:04:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mike Motyka Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Simulator newbie question Message-ID: <20071026210414.GA3867@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Motyka , gdb@sourceware.org References: <16020FEDDBAF5440A59EB485AC75B2BB023075D3@exchange.pixim.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16020FEDDBAF5440A59EB485AC75B2BB023075D3@exchange.pixim.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:54:13PM -0700, Mike Motyka wrote: > The GDB remote protocol is RSP - it's well documented and I assume this > is what the ARMul speaks over the socket it opens? No, the simulators in sim/ get linked directly into GDB. Other, more modern simulators run standalone and talk over a socket. Qemu for instance. I don't think you will find anyone else out here that knows about the ARMulator, though. It hasn't seen active development in a really long while. > Why are there references to RDP and RDI buried in the ARMul? I think that ARM uses those to control their own simulators. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery