From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4912 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2007 19:57:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 4627 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2007 19:57:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:57:22 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D5398340; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D307B981F2; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:57:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IkmLv-0004AW-PV; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:57:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Carlos Eduardo Seo , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Problems while debugging fortran Message-ID: <20071024195719.GA16009@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Carlos Eduardo Seo , gdb@sourceware.org References: <46EB035B.4090802@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070920173246.GJ16400@adacore.com> <46F2CE45.5020308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070920204622.GB4368@adacore.com> <20070920205629.GA17779@caradoc.them.org> <46FAD136.5030406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070926214619.GC9403@adacore.com> <471F70C0.3000206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071024193336.GI11797@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071024193336.GI11797@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:33:36PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Question to the other GDB contributors/maintainers: Is it going to > hurt GDB if we fallback to using "DW_AT_calling_convention = > DW_CC_program" to find the main? The DWARF3 manual says that this > attribute value was <>. > This is very unclear, since they don't explain what "support" > refers to. But for people stuck with XLF, if we can improve their > lives without hurting the rest of GDB, I'm ok with compromising and > using this attribute value be used to find the main. Yes, this does seem sensible. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery