From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24241 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2007 20:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 24232 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2007 20:51:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:51:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A224F1E716A; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:51:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bTT12EQQ3NAK; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:51:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617981E7162; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:51:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B9D82E7B58; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:51:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Kai.Tietz@onevision.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems Message-ID: <20071013205105.GA13789@adacore.com> References: <20071012161132.GE4044@adacore.com> <20071012174218.GH4044@adacore.com> <20071012222842.GD21800@adacore.com> <20071013024116.GB29152@adacore.com> <20071013154715.GE29152@adacore.com> <4711021C.8010805@portugalmail.pt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4711021C.8010805@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 > I propose goind the other way around. Start by adding the needed configury > bits needed, a mingw.mt file, and disabling the cygwin specific bits in > win32-nat.c around #ifdef __CYGWIN__ blocks. That's mostly how I did it, except for the win32-nat.c changes. I like your suggestions. I think we can get something minimal pretty quickly. Just to avoid duplicating efforts, who's in charge? :-) -- Joel