From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22754 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2007 11:55:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 22746 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2007 11:55:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:55:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3203C982AD; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:55:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B31981F2; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:55:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IgJ7D-0000UY-JG; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:55:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Guillaume MENANT Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB commands and GDB protocol Message-ID: <20071012115539.GA1873@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Guillaume MENANT , gdb@sourceware.org References: <470E1E65.9020606@geensys.com> <20071011130832.GA13491@caradoc.them.org> <470F23AB.5000307@geensys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <470F23AB.5000307@geensys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Guillaume MENANT wrote: > I've got an question about the use of GDB. When my wrapper application will > handle all commands described here : > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb_33.html#SEC713, how will I load my > embedded application ? GDB handle RAM/Flash commands but there is no "load" > command. So when I will make a "Load program" in Eclipse, will it use GDB > (RAM/Flash commands) ? Yes, it will. There's no special remote packets for load. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery