From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9799 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2007 12:31:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 9789 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2007 12:31:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:31:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 17570 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2007 12:31:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wind.local) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Oct 2007 12:31:36 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: m68k structure return register Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200706201325.07067.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200709302213.04766.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20070930204008.GA15765@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070930204008.GA15765@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710051631.30523.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On Monday 01 October 2007 00:40:08 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:13:04PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > If not, you can treat it just like m68k-linux. It is likely that > > > the Linux OS/ABI sniffer will already accept uClinux binaries. > > > > It does not seem so. The debuggable .gdb ELF binary does not have the > > .note.ABI-tag section so the linux sniffer won't catch it. Is there > > anything else I can check for? > > Not that I know of :-( Ok, so we can made structure return register right for all targets, except for uclinux. Or we can keep it as it us today -- wrong for bare-metal, rtems and unclinuxoldabi. Which one seems better? - Volodya