From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3988 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2007 08:27:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 3980 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2007 08:27:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from host-213-178-187-222.dsl.netic.de (HELO schleim.qwe.de) (213.178.187.222) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:27:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by schleim.qwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A6B62444 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:33:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Torsten Mohr To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: line numbers in backtrace? Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200709080928.10854.tmohr@s.netic.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709081033.21477.tmohr@s.netic.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 Hi, > They _are_ shown, usually. If you don't see them, perhaps your > program lacks adequate debug info. Can you show an example of a > backtrace without line numbers? Ouch, you're right. Wrong compile options. Sorry, Torsten.