From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13987 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2007 11:24:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 13874 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2007 11:24:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao103.cox.net) (68.230.240.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:24:45 +0000 Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070828112443.WVQ20760.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:24:43 -0400 Received: from black ([70.181.32.198]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id hPQj1X00H4GV2Jm0000000; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:24:43 -0400 Received: from bob by black with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IPzBW-00012F-94; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:24:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:24:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Nick Roberts , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Questions about gdb/mi support on the Mac Message-ID: <20070828112438.GJ6213@cox.net> References: <46CF1A71.1020002@sun.com> <200708281029.27514.apoenitz@trolltech.com> <18131.58128.433536.819432@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070828105502.GA7419@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070828105502.GA7419@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 06:55:02AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 08:55:44PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > It's probably enough to say that you will get unreliable behaviour trying > > to use Apple GDB from a frontend that is expecting the MI output of FSF GDB. > > If your frontend must run on a Mac then you either need to compile FSF GDB > > for the Mac (if that's possible) > > It isn't. Well, in that case, hopefully people realize that apple is making some silly decisions by making a monopoly on gdb front ends. Not that I believe this was there intention, but I do believe it was a consequence of there irresponsibility. Bob Rossi