From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2572 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2007 20:32:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 2539 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2007 20:32:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:32:35 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2B398308; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:32:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74C598100; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:32:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IL344-0000LG-F9; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:32:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vinod pandarinathan Cc: Paul Koning , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MIPS 64 bit addressing query Message-ID: <20070814203232.GA1300@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vinod pandarinathan , Paul Koning , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070806015122.GA29212@caradoc.them.org> <18103.27059.549214.117236@pkoning.equallogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 01:20:34PM -0700, Vinod pandarinathan wrote: > Does the sign extension happen when the addresses are stored in the > breakpoint structure in (set_raw_breakpoint) or even earlier when the > symbols are read from the executable ? Should be back here. What ABI and file format is your code? I just last week worked on a similar problem for N64 binaries in 32-bit ELF. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery