From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10804 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2007 04:33:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 10644 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2007 04:33:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-24.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (71.248.179.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:33:03 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 6ED462B352; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:33:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses Message-ID: <20070805043326.GA12639@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070802183431.GA6833@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070803231205.GB11438@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070804200423.GB21125@cox.net> <20070805000658.GA29704@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:13:26AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:06:58 -0400 >>From: Christopher Faylor >> >>Suggesting that there may be other motivations for the >>action, that we may be too stupid to do the right thing, that we may >>become untrustworthy over time, or chiding us to be open really seems >>like a pointless exercise to me. > >No one was suggesting any of these. It's natural that, upon hearing >about some rules which will result in rejecting messages, someone >would like to know the details about those rules. http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-08/msg00025.html