From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1971 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2007 03:51:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 1954 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2007 03:51:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nwd2mail10.analog.com (HELO nwd2mail10.analog.com) (137.71.25.55) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 03:51:34 +0000 Received: from nwd2mhb2.analog.com ([137.71.6.12]) by nwd2mail10.analog.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2007 23:51:32 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.19,220,1183348800"; d="scan'208"; a="47419658:sNHT27121955" Received: from nwd2exm4.ad.analog.com (nwd2exm4.ad.analog.com [10.64.53.123]) by nwd2mhb2.analog.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_28810+JAGae91741)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA28458; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nwd2exm5.ad.analog.com ([10.64.51.20]) by nwd2exm4.ad.analog.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:51:31 -0400 Received: from localhost ([10.64.204.110]) by nwd2exm5.ad.analog.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:51:31 -0400 From: Robin Getz Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 03:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: dewar@adacore.com, "Ian Lance Taylor" , b07584@freescale.com, jimb@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, "Eli Zaretskii" References: <46B2101F.6060305@adacore.com> <20070805000352.GA11072@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20070805000352.GA11072@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline To: "Undisclosed.Recipients": ; Message-Id: <200708042355.23161.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Sat 4 Aug 2007 20:03, Christopher Faylor pondered: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 09:50:48PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>From: Ian Lance Taylor > >>Date: 04 Aug 2007 11:32:44 -0700 > >> > >>As far as I can tell, you are requesting that we not do anything dumb, > > > >No, that's not it. My problem is that I don't see the motivation for > >rejecting such messages spelled out anywhere. The URL you mentioned > >_advises_ to do something, but, AFAIU, there's some policy issues > >involved here, which are not explained anywhere. > > Actually, the words politely requires that confidentiality notices not > be included. Since that was the best we could do until recently we > relied, unsuccessfully, on people to do the right thing. I've been > promising people for years that I'd modify the spam software enforce the > policy and a recent discussion on the gcc channel prodded me into taking > action. Is the concern of publishing the regex that people would modify things to get around it? Or why not just publish it somewhere? -Robin