From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2326 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2007 17:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2315 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2007 17:16:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:16:00 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946C698122; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:16:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A65B98100; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:16:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IGeHG-0008CC-3d; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:15:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: HW Watchpoint events and the inferior Message-ID: <20070802171558.GA31488@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , gdb@sourceware.org References: <1185981481.5248.11.camel@localhost> <20070801160027.GA28305@caradoc.them.org> <1185988407.4992.4.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1185988407.4992.4.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:13:27PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > Yes, in fact i'm looking forward to improve that situation. That's > why i'm going through some of the inferior handling > code. Unfortunatelly there isn't much documentation there, and > sometimes it gets rather bleak as to what GDB is really trying to > do, and how it would handle multiple traps. It's not sensible to ask how GDB handles this sort of thing, until it actually does. Did you mean how it _should_ handle it? Are you starting from Jan's patches? If not, why did you decide not to? I have been assuming that it would be a simple matter of merging them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery