From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30497 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2007 12:02:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 30487 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2007 12:02:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:02:32 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98244982CE; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:02:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C05A982A5; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:02:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I6mW5-0002mF-SZ; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:02:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Robert Norton Cc: Jim Blandy , s88 , Wenbo Yang , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: What should a CPU simulator support? Message-ID: <20070706120229.GB10648@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Norton , Jim Blandy , s88 , Wenbo Yang , gdb@sourceware.org References: <468C57AE.8020801@simplnano.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:26:48AM -0700, Robert Norton wrote: > Is this still the recommended way of making a built-in simulator? I Depends what you mean. I suppose it is, but I recommend not making a built-in simulator at all (using TCP to talk to your simulator). > noticed when upgrading our port that the api for simulator implemented > breakpoints has been removed! We're not interested in implementing soft > breakpoints so I had to resurrect this support in remote-sim.c. Do you mean SIM_HAS_BREAKPOINT? I believe it was removed four years ago for lack of any simulators in the tree which used it. That's life with an uncontributed port :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery