From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31005 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2007 20:28:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30996 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2007 20:28:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:28:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1015982C3 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:28:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE509829B for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:28:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I5SUm-0005SB-IH for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:27:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:28:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB in C++ Message-ID: <20070702202740.GA20459@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <46866F20.2010902@eagercon.com> <20070701205355.GC24316@caradoc.them.org> <46895E3B.5050807@avtrex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46895E3B.5050807@avtrex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:21:15PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > My question is: Does RMS have any say in the matter, and what are his thoughts > on it? With Joel and Mark in favor of staying with C, I think it's irrelevant. My two cents: no, this is a decision for the GDB developers. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery