From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3698 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 07:02:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 3676 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2007 07:02:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su (HELO zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su) (158.250.17.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:02:07 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1I2iaJ-0003In-Q3 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:02:04 +0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1I2iaC-00035X-5v; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:01:56 +0400 From: Vladimir Prus To: kdevelop@kdevelop.org Subject: Re: 'continue' command problem Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200706041421.21962.leonp@plris.com> In-Reply-To: <200706041421.21962.leonp@plris.com> Cc: Nick Roberts , gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706251101.54544.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 On Monday 04 June 2007 15:21, Leon Pollak wrote: [cross-posting to gdb-devel] > Hello. > > This is the message to Vladimir Prus (as the debugger interface maintainer): > > When the user defined gdb macro contains "continue" command inside, this > causes the debugger interface to loose its head (BP hit, ball/circle/point > presentation and BP tab are in disorder). This is more or less expected. In this case GDB fails to inform us that the target started running, so we think it's stopped, and many bad things can happen. Nick, I think your "async branch" is supposed to emit "^running" in all possible cases. Is that the case, and if so, do you think that improvement can be ported to gdb mainline quickly? - Volodya