From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30569 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2007 00:34:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 30561 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2007 00:34:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:34:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974992AA484; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:34:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id F2uLyiefaTl1; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:34:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC1C2AA454; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:34:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EF57E7B51; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: DELAYED: GDB 6.7 branch creation scheduled June 25th Message-ID: <20070623003622.GP18706@adacore.com> References: <20070608061902.GP3761@adacore.com> <20070621181530.GC12173@adacore.com> <18042.61938.458913.398215@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070622014101.GC18706@adacore.com> <18043.30976.871935.736190@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070622161752.GL18706@adacore.com> <18044.25556.843471.837917@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18044.25556.843471.837917@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 > You've not really answered my question but the prerogative is yours, of > course. Can you ask your question again? I probably didn't understand what you were asking. > Once the branch is made, I might miss the announcement for the > imminent release, so I would only ask that the bug I have reported: As of now, the release is scheduled one month after branching. > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-06/msg00022.html > > is indeed fixed before the release. You have to understand that this can not be guarantied by me. I could be underestimating the severity of the problem, but this issue hardly seems blocking. If you or anyone has a plan for fixing this issue and promises to propose a patch within a reasonable timeframe (let's say 2 weeks), then we can consider delaying the release a bit. Otherwise, I think we should proceed, and just have this particular issue documented as a known problem. -- Joel