From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21070 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2007 13:05:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 21057 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2007 13:05:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:05:22 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21A5982F9; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:05:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35669982E4; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:05:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I0dOp-0002Lh-Hy; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:05:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB discuss , Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: Regressions on x86 Message-ID: <20070619130535.GA9015@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Deuling , GDB discuss , Ulrich Weigand References: <20070619120157.GA6031@caradoc.them.org> <4677CE0F.1090002@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4677CE0F.1090002@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Markus Deuling wrote: > > Was elfread.o linked in? If not, what does config.log say about the > > -lbfd test? > > bfd/elf.o was compiled. elfread.o not. Then see the other part of my question :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery