From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-28774-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11224 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2007 17:38:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 11215 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2007 17:38:21 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:38:16 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5FHcCPW009700 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id l5FHcCsq019111; 	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:38:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200706151738.l5FHcCsq019111@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070605132547.GA10486@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:25:47 -0400)
Subject: Re: Destroying frame caches
References: <jelkeysh3t.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20070605125051.GA9024@caradoc.them.org> <jehcpmsg8p.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20070605132547.GA10486@caradoc.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:25:47 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:06:14PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:47:34PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > >> What function does gdb call to destroy a frame cache object?
> > >
> > > reinit_frame_cache destroys the whole cache; is that what you mean?
> > 
> > How can you deallocate any extra memory?
> 
> Extra memory normally goes on the frame obstack using
> frame_obstack_zalloc.  There's no hook for target-specific cleanup.

Targets should therefore use the same obstack for any additional
memory they need.