From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10121 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2007 17:36:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 10112 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2007 17:36:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:36:42 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5FHad3H012784; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id l5FHacS3024774; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200706151736.l5FHacS3024774@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: schwab@suse.de CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:47:34 +0200) Subject: Re: Destroying frame caches References: Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:47:34 +0200 > > What function does gdb call to destroy a frame cache object? IIRC we use obstacks for frame caches, so they disappear automagically whenever the part of the stack that contains the frame cache is freed.