From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23385 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 16:03:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23151 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jun 2007 16:03:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:03:29 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA43982F1; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:03:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4C3982D1; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:03:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HxmMn-0002wv-Np; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:03:41 -0400 Resent-From: drow@false.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:03:41 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <20070611160341.GB11320@caradoc.them.org> Resent-To: Andrew STUBBS , Rob Quill , Markus Deuling , gdb@sourceware.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS Cc: Rob Quill , Markus Deuling , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Scope Checking Patch Message-ID: <20070611155654.GA10916@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , Rob Quill , Markus Deuling , gdb@sourceware.org References: <466D07FE.4080800@de.ibm.com> <466D2B04.7040304@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466D2B04.7040304@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:03:41 -0400 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Also, like Markus said, always use context or unified diffs. Ordinary diff > output isn't nearly so useful. I'd also suggest using the -p option - it adds a > procedure name to each hunk - entirely cosmetic, but nice to > have. Yes. Rob, please use diff -up, and send patches to gdb-patches - very little should be cross-posted to both lists. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery