From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4776 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2007 19:29:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4767 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2007 19:29:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pauline.vellum.cz (HELO pauline.vellum.cz) (89.250.243.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:28:53 +0000 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pauline.vellum.cz (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l59JScFm002691; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:28:39 +0200 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l59JScSc025400; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:28:38 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l59JSZZD025398; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:28:35 +0200 Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:29:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Nick Roberts Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: PR tui/2173: Arrow keys no longer works in breakpoint command list Message-ID: <20070609192835.GA25350@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <18019.18081.448928.93993@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070604010633.GA927@caradoc.them.org> <18019.29775.303769.331474@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18019.29775.303769.331474@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:09:19 +0200, Nick Roberts wrote: ... > > I'm not sure how to fix it, either - > > the patch you cited was very tricky to come up with already :-( The whole reason why the patch was so tricky was giving up on using the synchronous readline () call. Replacing it with the other callbacked possibilities is not going to be backward compatible as readline () behavior is too complex. Going to provide a libreadline patch #2 but unfortunately only later. > I've not read the thread (it looked quite long) but the problem the patch > fixes (which seems to be for CLI, not TUI) doesn't seem important enough > to justify such an invasive change (apologies, if it fixed further problems). > > For now, could you please just revert it? Voting for its temporary removal (and it is going to be done for Red Hat GDB). Regards, Jan