From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-28646-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20502 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2007 09:17:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 20487 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2007 09:17:53 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su (HELO zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su) (158.250.17.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:17:46 +0000
Received: from Debian-exim by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) 	id 1Hu3GQ-0003p6-8i 	for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:42 +0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) 	by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) 	(Exim 4.50) 	id 1Hu3GO-0003ot-89; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:40 +0400
From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
To: Bogdan Slusarczyk <bodzio131@op.pl>
Subject: Re: tracing variables - is it ok?
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:17:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <465FD1AD.9040909@op.pl> <f3ols1$gp9$1@sea.gmane.org> <465FE337.9020704@op.pl>
In-Reply-To: <465FE337.9020704@op.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200706011317.39198.ghost@cs.msu.su>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2

On Friday 01 June 2007 13:13, Bogdan Slusarczyk wrote:
> Vladimir Prus pisze:
> > This seems weird. Can you also print 'a' right after creating varobj,
> > and right after -var-update, to make sure it's the problem with
> > variable objects, and not with something else. Please do this test with
> > gdb 6.6, or better yet, with CVS version.
> I did -var-evaluate-expression just after creating varobj and I got 
> proper value (testA, a=10 ). After -var-update (in testB) value is not 
> changed. I did this test with gdb  6.6.

Please do "print a". The -var-evaluate-expression won't show changed
value if -var-update did not mention a given variable object.

- Volodya