From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4352 invoked by alias); 25 May 2007 13:45:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4227 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2007 13:44:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:44:50 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC5A982D1; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:44:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342B0982D0; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:44:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hra61-00084I-TT; Fri, 25 May 2007 09:44:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Bogdan Slusarczyk Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: -var-create - @ var1 - where is '@' documented?? Message-ID: <20070525134445.GA30979@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bogdan Slusarczyk , gdb@sourceware.org References: <4656E73D.4080406@op.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4656E73D.4080406@op.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 03:40:13PM +0200, Bogdan Slusarczyk wrote: > Hi, can anybody tell me where I can find documentation for this syntax: > -var-create - *@* var1 > Docs from http://sourceware.org/gdb/download/onlinedocs/ and from > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/download/onlinedocs/gdb.html don't have any > mention about this feature. I suppose gdb has many undocumented features, > similar to above mentioned. Where I can find more accurate documentation? I'm sorry to sound trite, but if they were documented somewhere else, they wouldn't be called "undocumented". I think this is simply a bug in the manual. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery