From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 474 invoked by alias); 24 May 2007 05:52:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 464 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2007 05:52:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 05:52:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382EC48CEA0 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 01:52:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02002-01-6 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 01:52:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBBE48CE7D for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 01:52:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 70EC1E7B4F; Wed, 23 May 2007 22:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 05:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Is the patch tracker useful? Message-ID: <20070524055302.GA3643@adacore.com> References: <20070523203548.GA946@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070523203548.GA946@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 > But - will anyone miss it? It doesn't seem to have helped much. I cannot speak for the others, but as a datapoint, I personnally had all my patches reviewed in a very timely fashion without the help of the patch tracker (keep forgetting to use it). So I won't miss it. -- Joel