From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-28580-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31382 invoked by alias); 23 May 2007 00:17:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 31357 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2007 00:17:13 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2007 00:17:10 +0000
Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D084B267; 	Tue, 22 May 2007 19:17:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) 	by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1994B262; 	Tue, 22 May 2007 19:17:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1HqeXF-0008NH-7o; Tue, 22 May 2007 20:17:01 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:17:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>, gdb@sourceware.org, 	Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>, 	Pete MacLiesh <pmac@tensilica.com>, Ross Morley <ross@tensilica.com>
Subject: Re: Understanding GDB frames
Message-ID: <20070523001701.GA32173@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>, 	Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>, gdb@sourceware.org, 	Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>, 	Pete MacLiesh <pmac@tensilica.com>, Ross Morley <ross@tensilica.com>
References: <46521C04.7040405@hq.tensilica.com> <m3y7jgbt7j.fsf@codesourcery.com> <465341B8.9060208@hq.tensilica.com> <m3bqgc4d6g.fsf@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3bqgc4d6g.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:05:27PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Perhaps the best approach is to use both the return address and the
> entry point in the frame ID.  If either have changed, it's certainly a
> new frame.

I don't think this is worth adding complexity for, honestly.  Sure, it
will catch { foo(); foo(); }, but it won't catch for (i = 0; i < 10;
i++) foo ();.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery