From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-28558-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11307 invoked by alias); 22 May 2007 10:58:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 11297 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2007 10:58:07 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:58:00 +0000
Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4013B4B270; 	Tue, 22 May 2007 05:57:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) 	by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54254B267; 	Tue, 22 May 2007 05:57:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1HqS3p-0002OY-6F; Tue, 22 May 2007 06:57:49 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:58:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: Ross Morley <ross@tensilica.com>, 	Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>, gdb@sourceware.org, 	Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>, 	Pete MacLiesh <pmac@tensilica.com>
Subject: Re: Understanding GDB frames
Message-ID: <20070522105749.GA9192@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, 	Ross Morley <ross@tensilica.com>, 	Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>, gdb@sourceware.org, 	Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>, 	Pete MacLiesh <pmac@tensilica.com>
References: <46521C04.7040405@hq.tensilica.com> <46522B10.6090008@tensilica.com> <18002.20463.147887.664973@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070522023125.GB19198@caradoc.them.org> <18002.23109.871576.644682@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <18002.23109.871576.644682@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 02:49:41PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>  >                 ...But once the frame has gone we should recreate the
>  > varobjs, or else we should associate them with the function instead of
>  > the frame.
> 
> Would this be straightforward to implement?  Isn't there anything in their
> nature that makes this easier to do for watchpoints?

Nope.  We could do it in basically the same way for varobjs that we do
for watchpoints, if we decide it's useful.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery