From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10807 invoked by alias); 19 May 2007 05:43:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10796 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2007 05:43:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 May 2007 05:43:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711E948CED1 for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 01:43:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28851-01-7 for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 01:43:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE79648CEB6 for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 01:43:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF80FE7B4F; Fri, 18 May 2007 22:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 05:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: solib-aix5.c Message-ID: <20070519054342.GU3565@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 Hello, I have recently investigated a regression in core file loading on AIX, and will post a fix soon. However, this made me realize that we are still using the SOLIB_ADD and SOLIB_CREATE_INFERIOR_HOOK on this platform. I have checked, and it appears that we are the last one to use these macros. I haven't thoroughly check what "we" includes, but wouldn't it be nice if we could get rid of them entirely? In any case, I think what's involved is to move to the target_so_ops, right? It just so happens that I've found a file called solib-aix5.c. This file seems to have been created in 2001, but doesn't seem to be used at all. It's never included on any configuration as far as I can tell. Does anyone know the history of this file? -- Joel