From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3784 invoked by alias); 14 May 2007 14:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 3774 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2007 14:35:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 14:35:55 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41C34B267; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:35:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D094B4B262; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:35:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HnbeT-0003NS-6Y; Mon, 14 May 2007 10:35:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Gomez =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rio=2C_Jes=FAs?= Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Thread debugging. GDB for ARM. Message-ID: <20070514143553.GA12968@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Gomez =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rio=2C_Jes=FAs?= , gdb@sourceware.org References: <1179148650.10308.11.camel@DAFPC5206.ikusi.net> <20070514132805.GA25029@caradoc.them.org> <435A66F076E8344FA6D3917739BD99A40162483D@srviku004.ikusi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <435A66F076E8344FA6D3917739BD99A40162483D@srviku004.ikusi.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:16:50PM +0200, Gomez Rio, Jesús wrote: > Thanks for the link. > But I guess my problem is not described there. > I have another message: > Gdb: error initalizing thread_db library: version mismatch between libthread_db and libpthread > > I have read in the mailing list that both should have the same glibc. > (what do you mean there?). > > In another hand, I am already pointing solib-absolute-prefix to the directory libraries. If you're doing that, and getting the above error, then you are not pointing to the correct libraries. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery