From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1134 invoked by alias); 7 May 2007 19:12:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1123 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2007 19:12:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 May 2007 19:12:37 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAA24B267; Mon, 7 May 2007 14:12:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704104B262; Mon, 7 May 2007 14:12:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl8dO-0003Uv-KV; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:12:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 19:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Creating the gdb-6.7 branch soon (3 weeks to go?) Message-ID: <20070507191234.GA13430@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070507182844.GK3804@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070507182844.GK3804@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:28:44AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We're getting close to the planned branching date for the next GDB > release. Branching is planned May 27, a first pre-release 2 weeks > after, followed by an official release again 2 weeks after. > > I've noticed that development was quite active the past few weeks, > so if the planned dates are interfering with some ongoing work that > you'd like to finish before branching, let us know. Doesn't make much difference to me; but if I haven't dealt with the signed/unsigned char display issue by then, please remind me about it. Whatever change we decide to make we should do it before 6.7. I've been meaning to come back to that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery