From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24630 invoked by alias); 5 May 2007 04:44:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 24622 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2007 04:44:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2007 04:44:11 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6564B267; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:44:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017E44B262; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:44:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HkC7s-0008OI-DX; Sat, 05 May 2007 00:44:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 04:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jaimon Jose Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Setting breakpoints where duplicate symbols are present Message-ID: <20070505044408.GA32240@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jaimon Jose , gdb@sourceware.org References: <463BF26F.5000305@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <463BF26F.5000305@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 08:26:47AM +0530, Jaimon Jose wrote: > My questions are: > 1. How do I inspect all the symbols of the same name in the process > space? ( I tried loading the symbol from each library > load-symbol-file. It didn't help either. In case of ambiguity, dbx used > to show all symbols qualified with the library name and let us choose > the right one) > 2. How do I qualify a symbol with the library name where it belongs to? > ( for eg. `libfoo.so`foo_bar ) Basically, you can't. Yet. We know we need to fix this. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery