From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12913 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 21:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12889 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 21:40:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:40:03 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F4D4B267; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:40:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2324B262; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:39:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbO4E-0001sq-E0; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:39:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Denis PILAT Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Re: [sparc-solaris] unexpected warning when starting program Message-ID: <20070410213958.GB6338@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Denis PILAT , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070312051646.GI14401@adacore.com> <20070312110718.GB21646@caradoc.them.org> <45FF9DC3.20802@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45FF9DC3.20802@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Denis PILAT wrote: > This "unexpected warning" is also the one that causes the TUI to crash under > Solaris. > See the thread "TUI + gdbserver broken?" at url : > (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2007-03/msg00169.html) > > Removing that warning (I've tried that as well) will remove that problem too, > but it's only a side effect. I think we should fix both separately but when > you'll have removed think warning, the TUI bug will become invisible. Hi Denis, I seem to have lost my copy of that message so I can't reply to it, but if you'll post it again with a ChangeLog, I'll approve it. It seems like a good place. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery