From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31908 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2007 14:45:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 31897 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2007 14:45:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:45:35 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F1D4B267; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:45:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B8C4B262; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:45:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HZTDR-0008IC-RP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:45:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: generic error with a statically linked multithreaded program Message-ID: <20070405144533.GA31862@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Atsushi Nemoto , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070405.145806.89068923.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20070405142913.GA30928@caradoc.them.org> <20070405.233933.122593816.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070405.233933.122593816.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:39:33PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:29:13 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > I found gdb can not run a statically linked multithreaded program on > > > Fedora Core 6. > > > > Please see the glibc bugzilla for more information about this. I've > > been waiting for a long time to hear back from them... > > Thank you. > Is it http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2696, right? > > If so, the gdb patch mentioned in it is already merged in gdb 6.6? I think so, but I don't remember for sure. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery