From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8588 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2007 02:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 8578 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2007 02:16:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:16:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1397E48CDA7; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:16:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25106-01-2; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:16:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138F348CCBA; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:16:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FC1DE7B41; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:17:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:16:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: jagorak@wp.pl, gdb@sourceware.org, hilfinger@adacore.com Subject: Re: Ada arrays - a problem with aggregate notation. Message-ID: <20070326021736.GX6663@adacore.com> References: <19311509093.20070325002416@wp.pl> <20070325020544.GS6663@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 > > > There is limited support for [Ada] array and record aggregates. They are > > > permitted only on the right sides of assignments, as in these examples: > > > set An_Array := (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) > > > (...) > > > == end quote == > > > > Hmmm, I think the documentation might be inaccurate. > > What would be the accurate way of describing the current support? Actually, I take that back, I tried on a simple example, and the assignment went smoothly. I'm pretty busy these days, but if Jan could send more details, I'll do my best to look at this (sources, build command, platform, GDB version, and a copy/paste of the GDB session). -- Joel