From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 554 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2007 11:55:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 541 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2007 11:55:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:55:30 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886944B267; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:55:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649194B262; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:55:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HUiMh-0007H4-RE; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:55:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Xu Haojun-a18535 Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb@sourceware.org, Xie ShaoHua-A22496 Subject: Re: Help with stepping into shared-library with stripped ld-linuxon arm board Message-ID: <20070323115527.GA27943@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Xu Haojun-a18535 , Michael Snyder , gdb@sourceware.org, Xie ShaoHua-A22496 References: <6D989D7EEBF1A34EA5CAF6A24FD3E15801E3CB50@zmy16exm63.ds.mot.com> <20070322154506.GA7032@caradoc.them.org> <1174588974.9964.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <6D989D7EEBF1A34EA5CAF6A24FD3E15801E3D06D@zmy16exm63.ds.mot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6D989D7EEBF1A34EA5CAF6A24FD3E15801E3D06D@zmy16exm63.ds.mot.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:56:55PM +0800, Xu Haojun-a18535 wrote: > But this try seems not work, it still takes a long time when > stepping into shared-library, we are really confused where goes wrong, > it there any other place which controls the shared-library stepping > behavior besides enable_break() in solib-srv4.c ? You've already asked this question and I've already answered it. There are a lot of things that will go wrong without symbols. I suspect this one is related to "fixup". -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery