From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25643 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2007 13:55:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 25634 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2007 13:55:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:55:34 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A024B267; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:55:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6F54B262; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:55:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HTeoB-0008Vw-5k; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:55:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Sascha Radike Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Unable to interrupt a stepping GDB Message-ID: <20070320135527.GA31823@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Sascha Radike , gdb@sourceware.org References: <000001c76af2$f9828960$02b2a8c0@insanenotebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c76af2$f9828960$02b2a8c0@insanenotebook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 02:23:38PM +0100, Sascha Radike wrote: > Should I raise a bug ? Does anyone know how to fix this? Not offhand, but I agree that it should be fixed. Our way of handling user Control-C is very complicated, though. There's a "QUIT;" in resume() already. It looks like that's supposed to accomplish what you want, but we're not setting the flag it checks in time. I guess the question is which of the various SIGINT handlers is running for you. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery