From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20981 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2007 04:56:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 20965 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2007 04:56:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kz-easy.com (HELO almaty.kz-easy.com) (85.214.25.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 04:56:49 +0000 Received: from alatau.radix50.net (dslb-088-064-006-072.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.64.6.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by almaty.kz-easy.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l264ufUw018566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:56:42 +0100 Received: from alatau.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alatau.radix50.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id l264uf2O023199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:56:41 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by alatau.radix50.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l264uef9023198 for gdb@sourceware.org; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:56:40 +0100 Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 04:56:00 -0000 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: backtrace in core on arm-linux Message-ID: <20070306045640.GA23035@radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070305184323.GA4506@radix50.net> <20070305185255.GA13217@caradoc.them.org> <1173122066.29183.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1173122066.29183.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 Hello Daniel and Michael, Thanks for your fast responses! On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:14:26AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Just as a data point -- a few months ago I tried debugging > an arm-linux core file with gdb, and it seemed to work fine > then. I believe I was at gdb-6.5. I don't specifically > remember doing a backtrace, but it would be surprising if > I didn't do one. That's interesting. I've tried 6.4-debian and 6.6-debian, both didn't work for me. What was your kernel version? I suppose core file writing shouldn't be different for different arm machine types, right? With kind regards, -- Baurzhan Ismagulov http://www.kz-easy.com/