From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13515 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2007 13:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 13502 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2007 13:25:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kz-easy.com (HELO almaty.kz-easy.com) (85.214.25.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:24:57 +0000 Received: from alatau.radix50.net (dslb-088-064-017-148.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.64.17.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by almaty.kz-easy.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l1EDOnKo006559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:50 +0100 Received: from alatau.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alatau.radix50.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id l1EDOliY021995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:48 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by alatau.radix50.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1EDOlsj021994 for gdb@sourceware.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:47 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:14:00 -0000 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: build problem in tcl/compat/strstr.c Message-ID: <20070214132447.GE10538@radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070214123558.GD10538@radix50.net> <20070214124244.GA29928@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070214124244.GA29928@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 Hello Daniel, On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:42:44AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:35:58PM +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > > I don't mind having gdb's own strstr implementation compiled in, so I > > did the hack below. An alternative were to check for stddef.h and > > include it, otherwise defining NULL ourselves (I guess we shouldn't > > include string.h since it could have a different prototype, which would > > produce a warning). > > > > How should we proceed? > > Please either ask the Insight list, who may care, or else use > --disable-gdbtk when cross compiling; GDB itself does not use TCL. This helps, thanks for the fast response! With kind regards, -- Baurzhan Ismagulov http://www.kz-easy.com/