From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1039 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2007 14:03:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 1031 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2007 14:03:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:03:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9837248CEAD; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:03:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01511-01-10; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:03:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (joel.gnat.com [205.232.38.116]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F63E48CE28; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:03:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CDA3E34C099; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:04:06 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:03:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ian C White , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Reference to old glob directory in gdb 6.5 makefile Message-ID: <20070126140405.GA5208@adacore.com> References: <20070120043704.GA22386@nevyn.them.org> <20070122181952.GA16917@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070122181952.GA16917@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2 > > [tcsetpgrp failed in terminal_inferior: Not owner] > > warning: no shared library support for this OS / ABI > > Warning: > > Cannot insert breakpoint 1. > > Error accessing memory address 0x1a968: I/O error. > > > > osabi is set to "auto", which means "AIX". The tcsetpgrp error is the > > result of attach_flag not being set. > > > > What is the current state of support for aix5 on powerpc? Is this a gdb > > issue or a bfd issue? > > These I am afraid I don't know. Joel tests on AIX; last I remember, it > was a bit bad, but not this broken. I don't know either. I just reran the testsuite on AIX. The results are not up to par with the better ones, but it's still OK. I searched the testsuite output (gdb.log), and found no occurrence of this problem. -- Joel