From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29038 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2007 13:42:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29029 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2007 13:42:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:42:49 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HA4sD-0000jK-Tz; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:42:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB Discuss Subject: Re: step_resume breakpoints native+remote Message-ID: <20070125134241.GA2739@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Deuling , GDB Discuss References: <45B8B1D9.1030002@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45B8B1D9.1030002@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:34:17PM +0100, Markus Deuling wrote: > Why isn't there a step_resume breakpoint then? Does gdbserver handle that > in a different way ? Yes - gdbserver never reports the stop for __nptl_create_event to GDB so GDB doesn't need a step resume breakpoint. gdbserver handles it automatically. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery