From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27495-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8844 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2007 19:33:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 8836 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2007 19:32:59 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:32:51 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0DJVpX2026368; 	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:31:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0DJVpqa022293; 	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:31:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:33:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200701131931.l0DJVpqa022293@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: uweigand@de.ibm.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, eliz@gnu.org,         gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070113192252.GA653@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:22:52 -0500)
Subject: Re: bigcore.exp on 64-bit systems
References: <200701131450.l0DEoWpP029656@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200701131831.l0DIVZWE032470@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20070113192252.GA653@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:22:52 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Ergo I don't think what it's doing right now is useful.  Should we
> limit its allocation to, perhaps, 4GB (2**32)?

I'd have no problem with that.

Mark