From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28591 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2007 14:26:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 28583 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2007 14:26:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:26:30 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H5NMR-0005wt-Db; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:26:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mathieu Lacage Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: help string for "break" command Message-ID: <20070112142627.GA22849@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mathieu Lacage , gdb@sourceware.org References: <1168602087.2789.35.camel@garfield.inria.fr> <1168606081.2789.38.camel@garfield.inria.fr> <1168609517.2789.47.camel@garfield.inria.fr> <20070112134932.GA21726@nevyn.them.org> <1168611571.2789.53.camel@garfield.inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1168611571.2789.53.camel@garfield.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:19:31PM +0100, Mathieu Lacage wrote: > Would there be opposition to an 'sbreak' command which would ensure that > a software breakpoint is used _all the time_ ? I would certainly object unless you could give a good reason why there should be one. We have too many marginal commands already. Note, "read only" in a Unix VM sense does not have anything to do with this decision; ptrace overrides that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery