From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27424-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18994 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2007 14:59:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 18985 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2007 14:59:26 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from brical.or.uni-bonn.de (HELO brical.or.uni-bonn.de) (131.220.141.99)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:59:19 +0000
Received: from wse04.or.uni-bonn.de (bg-1.or.uni-bonn.de [131.220.141.100]) 	by brical.or.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC9C3B7D0 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:58:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.220.143.130] (wse00.or.uni-bonn.de [131.220.143.130]) 	by wse04.or.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17813E927 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:02:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@or.uni-bonn.de>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Differences between program runs with and without gdb
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:59:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <200701101517.20024.bartoschek@or.uni-bonn.de> <200701101548.40353.bartoschek@or.uni-bonn.de> <45A4FED2.30803@st.com>
In-Reply-To: <45A4FED2.30803@st.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200701101558.33752.bartoschek@or.uni-bonn.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2

Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 15:57 schrieb Andrew STUBBS:
> Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> > both parts do not emplain my problem. First the program is single
> > threaded and uses no signals. Second it does not measure time and behaves
> > deterministic. Therefore performance differences should have no effect.
>
> Does it make a difference when you run under GDB, but without using
> stepping/breakpoints or other explicit commands?
>
> In other words, what might you be asking GDB to do to your program?

There is no stepping and no breakpoints are active. The program starts, it 
terminates and the debugger is quitted. 

The program has no user interaction.

Christoph