From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27664 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 15:42:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27655 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2007 15:42:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:42:00 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2rCf-0006xx-Q8; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:41:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New Ada failure Message-ID: <20070105154157.GA26403@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20070104202406.GA26522@nevyn.them.org> <20070105035647.GB3434@adacore.com> <20070105035904.GA9926@nevyn.them.org> <20070105145433.GH3434@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070105145433.GH3434@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:54:33PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I have now checked in a patch in GCC that explains that the GNAT > runtime should not be stripped. Would you mind filing a bug with > the Debian maintainers? I'm not familiar with the procedure. You > may want to mention to them that they should be able to build the > runtime without -g. There is a flag for it, probably LIBGNATCFLAGS > or some such. The makefiles will know to force -g -O1 for the few > units we need. Done, though we may take a different approach. Meanwhile, should we let the test fail for this case, or mark it UNSUPPORTED? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery